Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Vehicle sought in connection to Paige woman's murder[2016/11/05]
-
Rigid Transparent Plastics: Global Markets Outside North America[2016/10/14]
-
2016years UL94v-0 flame rate test report[2016/09/11]
-
On the sleepy Hawaiian island of Kauai sits a first of its kind solar and battery project.[2016/11/18]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
Surface Pro 3 plagued by more battery problems[2016/09/23]
-
The cost of plastic packaging[2016/10/18]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]